Peak 263 does not allow reading

At that time, I would say, 'It's all wrong. What's right?' The small logic behind it is correct. You can only do it this way. And then, the nobility he gave you, the kind he gave you, suddenly entered a state of selflessness. You can't imagine it. You watch him every day. Then, if you read your book again, you will say that we Chinese and foreigners have made such an arduous effort from ancient times to the present. What reason do I have to abandon myself? At that time, someone said that I, Zhang Ruwen, might come to college, but I could not even read books.

You are not even allowed to read books or enter the library because you do not have a work permit. How could you still dream of becoming a professor in the future? It is impossible to have such imagination. However, this is not important. Professors are actually some people who do something inappropriate and boring. The words' position 'and' sacred 'are not the same thing.

But you have to be able to be a dignified person. It seems that no one in China, Song Wu, has ever said that no matter what, you still have to treat me as a dignified person. The four words' dignified 'are difficult now.

I hope that one day after graduating from college, you will also have no other choice but to stay in that place for two years. Let me tell you, their aura was formed at this time, and their magnanimity was formed. You don't answer.

Tolstoy once said, 'A hammer can smash glass, but it can also exercise steel. If you want to make glass, you have to do it. There is a possibility that I won't be able to live in this place immediately. It's not a place that people live in, but you have to make it through. This is today's Teacher Zhang.'.

I really can't imagine it, because a middle-aged person asked me what 516 is a few days ago, and I said history is really fast. The 516 notification in 1966 changed the fate of many people in our country, but now middle-aged people don't even know, and people in their forties don't even know this fundamental thing.

If you don't work hard, these things will be ruined. Chinese culture is going to be lost, and world culture is going to be lost. What efforts should we make?

You guys started looking for jobs in your senior year, doing this and that, but I didn't tell you to start reading more in-depth books in your senior year because they are in higher grades.

Hegel said that the inner finite contains the infinite within oneself now, but this synthesis can only be said that, like Jesus Christ, who is alive, we must live in order to achieve this synthesis. Hegel's thought-provoking statement here is that he is a life full of love, an intermediary between finite and infinite, not something else, but love.

How to communicate Hegel's concept of finite and infinite?

Communicating through love is the great love of the universe, not through reflection. The intermediary between finite and infinite is love, not reflection.

Once the Germans wanted to poke Habermas out, the German government said, "What's the joke about Habermas' Federal Germany's Hegel? How can he be a Hegel? We don't need to mention the depth and breadth of their philosophical attainments and theories.".

The kind of ultimate feeling that gives you is not present in Habermas' works, so it's completely different.

The early theological stage of Hegel was related to his major in university, which was mainly focused on studying religious issues.

If we start to delve into philosophical thinking below, we must talk about his relationship with two people, one is Fichte and the other is Schelling, because his philosophical problems followed those of the two of them.

Hegel published his first philosophical work, "On the Differences between Fichte and Schelling's Systems of Philosophy," in 1801. This work has long been published in a thin paragraph, but it is not easy to understand when read. This work can be seen to some extent as a defense of Schelling, because when I talked about Schelling before, everyone believed that Schelling's philosophy was just a variant of Fichte's philosophy, and Hegel proved that he actually promoted Fichte's philosophy.

Xie Lin argued Fichte's conceptual proposition that the distinction between subjectivity and objectivity is a subjective distinction, which is my setting. Therefore, this distinction is flawed. Why is there a flaw?

Because the boundary between me and me is not absolute in itself, we can draw this line in different ways, ideologically or arbitrarily. Therefore, it fundamentally depends on our personality, how we draw the line, how we act, but there must be a perspective that anticipates both viewpoints and accommodates both subjective and objective perspectives.

Xie Lin called this viewpoint absolute, which is definitely not something I established. Absolute is an absolute tolerance, an absolute setting that includes both subjectivity and objectivity. Therefore, Xie Lin believes that how can you know there is an absolute? Xie Lin said that there is only one way, and we intuitively grasp that there is such an absolute. There is an absolute statement that Hegel clearly agrees with, and he is defending himself by believing that this route is correct.

So, Schelling did have a guiding role in Hegel's early period.

He said that by doing so, Schelling secretly elucidated Kant's three major critiques of reality, namely that Kant distinguishes between concepts and relationships, and this distinction itself is only an abstraction derived from our experience of existence. The world is divided into freedom, nature, and then aesthetics and imagination, but it is only an abstraction obtained from our experience again. In fact, the experience we still have is a whole.

Hegel saw that the experience of our human existence itself is a whole. Why do I have some questions about your current situation? You think that the most important thing in life is to first study and find a job. This is not right. In fact, a person's experience of survival is 360 degrees and comprehensive. When living in the world, one should pursue many things. horse

At that time, Ke Si and his daughter gave him a small test and said their favorite motto. He used the ancient Roman saying, 'I have everything that a person has.' It doesn't mean that everything is prepared for me, but rather that this person should have the most enjoyment and grasp of the world in life.

We are really limiting ourselves now, to a large extent, killing our own lives. When we were children, our parents said they wanted them to learn, but their children didn't fully recognize their favorite piano, foreign language or anything. Then, they forced them to do well in school, sent money through the back door, and when they grew up, they instilled in us that the most important thing is to find a job and a partner in the future. I never thought that the most important thing for you is that this life is comprehensive. You need to live happily and richly.

Reading Hegel and Kant based on facts is useless, you can't understand them. Do you think it's an intellectual question? Some people use this sentence to ask what it means?

Philosophical questions cannot be asked in this way. It's not about what this sentence means. Even high school teachers cannot ask in this way. What does this sentence mean? Do you think it's in classical Chinese? I can't understand this sentence. How do you explain it? It's not true. His entire philosopher, first and last, must be included in the text.

Secondly, he has the context of the text itself, which is his era. The era has its context, which is the universe itself. You didn't consider these factors, so if you insist on saying this sentence, it's like how Wang Yangming couldn't separate himself through bamboo, so Yangming is not as good as Zhu Zi in terms of qi. He later said, 'Just go inside and I can solve any problem, it's not like that.'. How can he explain that bamboo is just bamboo? Saying bamboo is like saying 'I'm looking for things', but you have to consider connecting all his other things together. You can't just say that he has said this sentence.

What does' one flower, one world 'mean? Do you have to think like this at this point?

This is a big picture, your whole big picture. What bothers me the most is when someone comes to ask me what you mean. I can also explain it to you, but it's not something that can be explained in just one or two sentences. You have to understand it.

Our modernity dictates that his master's degree program lasts for three years, while his doctoral program lasts for three years. After three years, he must graduate, which is impossible. In my opinion, you should not bother with his three-year and six-year studies. This is a stage of your life, and it is not shameful that you cannot produce a thesis here. If your life is enriched, what does it matter, and what is good to do with a thesis.

I see a lot of messy things now. Every year when we recruit students, there are many people who are completely clueless, but they are still recruited. There are five or six people there. I am a doctoral student in the School of Philosophy, why not?

Because our era is not a completely rational era, there is nothing to say. If you know me, then you have to invite me in, or if I have already greeted you, then you have to invite me. There is no other way. We all think about things like this, and I hope to cherish our own lives. You have to postpone many things and be able to let them go, so that you can become a great philosopher.

Of course, you will also feel that if society is like this, you must have a rebellious heart, not necessarily to collide with others, but to sneer at these things. If these popular things are sneered at, you will be free. Why do we need to be truly free when we study philosophy? Just give us some freedom to move around, don't pay attention to all your messy things.

Don't bother with those messy things, you will feel very comfortable. Only when you read Hegel and reach your level can you read it. For example, when we read Zhu Zi now, you don't have the same spirit as him. You don't have his kind heart, you're just from an intellectual perspective. What does this mean? What does this sentence mean? Does it make sense?

It's not very meaningful, not to say it's completely meaningless, but it's not very meaningful.

So Hegel is very clear about Schelling here, he believes that Schelling is looking at the problem from a holistic experience that exists in our lives. Hegel's dissatisfaction with Fichte is that Fichte actually completely abandoned Kant's demand for intuition, and was forced to understand the non self as merely a setting constructed for himself, leading to a one-sided conclusion that the distinction between subjectivity and objectivity is established subjectively.